Citizen 2-Ply "Claps" Back...... A Wardrobe.....

SCAD is already around roughly 4 Billion in damages based on the defraud to keep their lights on in this matter of obstruction of justice and their revenue which legally would be mine solely at this point. 

The above would be accurate based on SCAD’s willful choice to remove the rights claim and liabilities from their catalog that existed in every version prior to legal complaint. 

The action of preventive measures by the college not only set up the stage of defraud, but also illegal search and seizure and acting on the interest of college protect which inadvertently created potential buyers remorse to the student body when they figure out the policy post admissions and begin of classes.

As SCAD would of ceased to operate had the actions and private intellectual property of Bonneau’s ownership and governmental protect, Bonneau would be entitled to damages of all tuition collected since time of defraud noted. 

SCAD’s revenue is around 980 million a year.

The above defraud was brought up not only in legal private arbitration, but also published in book form in fact of unaltered transcripts from the legal proceedings published in the electronic ebook, “Philip Arthur Bonneau. V. The Savannah College of Art & Design: a law novice story.

Although the damages have compounded over the years, the actual figure on that action above alone is correct that SCAD cannot legally collect any tuition from students without undestood damages to I in their continued operations.

It is noted in private testimony that I made it clear to opposing council and the JAMS federal retired judge that neither entity is following the legally mandated ADRPA, which has already been cited as something opposing council was doing before arbitration and in legal proceedings, amounting to the disclosure of statement by plantiff that neither one is going to get paid and SCAD knows the breach of protocol.

As required by JAMS procedure during constitutional claims, JAMS did not report back to the court on the matter when they arose making the entity liable while calling into question the constitutionality of private arbitration without active federal oversight on the matter as constitutional rights were not only stripped, but attacked and exploited during complaint.

As all rights to seek council were violated during this time, plantiff has proven over and over that their intellectual property was attacked and used by the college and other entities of public trade. 

Law Novice is not entirely sure the damages on the copyright side of this but a figure can be found to be reconcilable in what has been forced to be public conversation and debate. 

Can you have a bit of consideration that is before we get into copyright infringement charges and facts and onto the CLASSIC which justifiies exactly what I legally said anyways on the matter and landscape. 

Considering known liabilities have been procedurally known and acted on since 2021 by SCAD, it is understood that 5 years of obstruction of justice is on the table here along with entire student loan forgiveness of at least the college on the matter of a defaulted court case that goes into the stripping of constitutional rights of the pro se plantiff and them adamently attempting to uphold the Constitution regardless of the cost of retained “Hope” and protect of American Dream for anyone. 

There is no reason for continuance on the attacks towards I and I find the story of what was never a problem pre-2018 for I and into direct combat with myself on American Soil has been addressed to the best of my ability in the book collecctions called indirectly “The Porteguese Man-O-War comprised of the books, “Chasing Jabberwocks Parts 1-3", "A Facsimilie Question:6 Minutes to Lunchtime,” and “No’Starving Artist’s”. 

Any of the SCAD areas specifically have been addressed in the nearly 3000 page book, “Philip Arthur Bonneau. V. The Savannah College of Art & Design: a law novice story.” 

If there were specifics of life’s investment and proprietary to self of the legality of my time and energy that fit into other overarching narratives, they were done so in other books in historical context of time and necessity to survive and find a way to put food on my table and absolutely one day have a family but I had to go to war first and between the above 4 sections, I was as proactive and precise as I could be to not shy away from the protection of myself, my family, my peers, fellow citizens and most certainly global nest egg investments of future generations.

There are procedural aspects of this that must be accounted for and it is noted that the 5th cannot be claimed in laying those out from the minute of report to now on the matter and it is absolutely written in federal law that congress has to compensate for intellectual property usage.