A Shouting Match to Some - Civility in Others.
A carryover from May 15th written (slightly modified)
“Your fucking political agenda is no match for The American Dream knowing it is global and yes, I will curse out the highest office in any area that this was allowed to happen.
Former presidents are not free from prosecution and in that liability you become a liability to The United States of America by default in protectionism and isolationist.
I’m a child of this Earth and respect to all countries joined together as I protect their child and heritage in exploitation that, in the United States, we do not divide. We do not bank on one’s suicide and we never ever try to divide this country as either president or would-be elect.
The collective conscious has enough evidence to support that you either better humanity or fall to the wayside in all privileged thoughts. The office of president always represents hope and capitalism is completely voided of that dream as private ventures shift to the public corporation that is America. Think of others and either time spent wasted on ego vs. doing the right thing.”
The argument that a president can not be prosecuted or sued is contrary to the belief of being “Untouchable”, “Infallible” and free to do whatever he/she wants without liability. As no man/woman is afforded that protection; so must the argument be challenged and countered.
If any president past, present, future cannot be prosecuted or sued based on their status (current or former), they too loose all rights to sue anybody in any scenario as they cannot be challenged in argument under that conjecture. They also cannot directly press charges on anyone as even judges can be found prosecutable, thus possibly over extending their executive privilege into the judicial branch at the time or none at all.
By having the bully pulpit removed from this argument, the conversation becomes about one’s interests and intentions. If a former/sitting president is not prosecutable, the damages they inflict on others becomes the liability of The United States of America where civil, state & federal complaints are pushed in a direction where “The Untouchable” is either anointed incapable of error & wrong doing or raises questions on could they ever have any capitalistic venture afterwards as it raises questions on unfair competition and business practices. The fallibility of corporations cannot be protected by someone unprosecutable and would have to be looked at extensively from judge of character and brand promise.
In prosecution arguments, one has to look at actions as either for self or country. As a president represents all parties, races, religions, orientations and genders in that capacity, other areas represent rule of law and the other change & function.
As party titles are held, they all represent thumbprints to the states & territories of the definition of “American”. If one were to create parties, one looks to Democratic Republican values where parties all have brand promises, employee handbooks & leadership roles before coming together or not to play Stratego® with one another (now expanded beyond the 2 party version) to capture The American Flag for everyone.
The responsibility of the President should be looked at corporately in the “Too Big to Fail” category where if approached systematically with no prosecution available; further adaptation is required in the check and balance arena to back up “The Untouchable Claim”. I’ve explored the idea of 2 Presidents/2 Vice-Presidents to alleviate liabilities while also promoting mental health of office holders that gives balanced rationale and peace of mind when executing executive orders (or lack there of). This is based around many points of discussion including “The Great Invisible Wall” and the events surrounding Jan. 6 2021.
One must look at the events of terminology & party names. As the standard parties are Republican and Democrat, other parties lay outside the system where a 3rd major party is suggested to break-up divisions knowing multiple Houses and Party Branches already exist.
The word “Trumpism” is defined on the internet already and broad with references where brand promises say one thing and rule of law says another. It is defined by action one way or another where according to wiki, “a set of mechanisms for acquiring and keeping control of power associated with Donald Trump…” (8) (9)
Now…that can be taken many ways where the focus should be on sets of modifications, addenda and referendums on acquiring and balancing out the focus from one political power back to the priorities of respect for the ideas of The United States and voided of dominance over one class, gender, race over another in the 331 million+ others that also are namesakes to America knowing we are all equal in respect to the 195(countries).
The term denotes one things where the 331 million is the living aspect and not the cumulative social collective of investment and learned behavior. Is a party or movement sustainable surrounded by one person or greater ideals of connection?
Imagine if Clintonite was used to combat Trumpism. Would the references last longer than generational connection? Perhaps the Bushwackers are for something else. Perhaps the argument is a complete Obamanation of brand and promises. As one sounds from the Trumpit, it is important to know that if there wasn’t brand approval to the actions of Trumpism, how does that work in realms where others are definitely prosecutable?
If positions held in corporate belief standards, the idea of acceptable losses is to be considered while looking into bankruptcies and collections. Self vs. Country gain where the collection bins are circumstantial based on knowledge and belief systems. Strongly held beliefs in areas where passion and conviction leads to intention. If intention to keep Trump in power, it is far more beneficial for him not to run for re-election than to seek another term as the choice of could vs. should becomes a private win on both sides while things grow back from talking about one’s power and privilege to the idea of what are our rights and whit is sacred to this country and world.
If he runs, he has 4 more years possibly if there is a win and then that is the end of his political career. If he runs and loses, he could always come back over and over again thus bringing in influence, intention and money. If he doesn’t run there is always the chance of him down the line thus solidifying his bases in the “Wait and See” category. At the same time a need to answer the prosecutable arguments where the bully pulpit and the division of country and rhetorical downgrades and slams get worked on as a country.
With names used in Media, legislative and in belief-system debate, one has to look at what that name represents and what is allowed prior and moving forward. “Refocus America” from division, ridicule and the “free to do whatever you want” mentality from those who have a supported system to lose nothing while everyone else sacrifices on decisions every day.
CNN reported on a Bannon Cast where he talks threats to politicians and Garland on Impeachment if Trump is indicted. The take away from this is the fear and threat aspect/tactic that is obviously sanctioned and never denounced as a brand promise to Trumpism. In the “Too Big To Fail” category it is obvious that threats, ridicule, scare tactics and “The Bully Trumpit” is used to continue operating in fear which pushes things back to history repetition. If unable to be prosecuted, then the rules can go one way or another where sanctioned behavioralism and influence lead to social division and the events of Jan. 6, 2021. If the rule of law is not enforced in areas allowed prior to where things are going, it will continue to degrade the value of The United States into private corporatization, where we lose our collective identity to those that can never be prosecuted, too big to fail and clearly capable of error in any direction.
Mr. Bannon,
As I recall you were terminated from your position under The Trump Administration.
It is known internally and externally how you operate and where you think your influence is.
How do you get to speak on behalf of the former president of The United States with fear tactics & false influence?
The events surrounding Jan. 6th and the behavioral subjectry puts you in possible liability for continuing to fan the flames of constant uprising and possible personal injury to others and country in repeated documented instances.
The president “may” not be prosecutable, but his circle and connections based on known behavior very much are.
While entitled to your opinion, we are all trying to stay ahead of the game on how one person’s belief system leads to the false notion of pardons for bad behavior at the expense of the sanity and civility of The American People.
As a man with a voice, if you want to say one thing or another about continual fear towards others, you are free to say whatever you want. It is inferred that you can’t be impeached but definitely can be prosecuted. It is also inferred that perhaps times in Administrations was a great beginner’s program for talking about how to strengthen American policy and stability outside the learned behavior of your surroundings. Fear leads down many paths…
I suppose Trump will tell you what you can and cannot say about him with a possible change of approach from one source to another. As it is assumed he is very brand protective; sanctioned rhetoric could lead to a perception of how he wants the country in constant fear and power plays one way or another. It has been scientifically proven that constant states of fear and tension can have some side effects such as lowering of one’s life expectancy, constant mood swings, insistence of verifiable persecution, loss of income, loss of faith, patterned morale loss, and emotive meme’ing.
It is very cognizant the behavior that the Trump brand has recognized and sanctioned. The unspoken sanctionary really adds up on what is and isn’t his brand.
Fear not though; there is hope.
In support for the American Standard of Civility and Culture, narrow points-of-views can be opened up to broader thoughts beyond any political season and what we leave behind in legacy and of support for future generations.
Burnt from the past behavior, it is important to think of the future brightly beyond the degradation of policy and scare tactics of sociology. Instinct born of constant fear and persecution bridges people together against a singular enemy more so than divide. The Great Invisible Wall of the past has to come down from isolation and elitism in order to understand that actions have consequences and everyone is always held responsible for their heroics and villainy according to law.
From a civics standpoint, I am wondering if it is your belief a president cannot be indicted, was this from a certain point of view where the trickle down effect was a hope for pardons to playtime at the White House within the administration? A time-out may be in order to understand the severity of how battle cries and rhetoric has changed. Especially in a positive direction where the extended years of elite playtime has created severe corporate consequences to these colonies.
We are trying to move forward with a “Be Better” approach towards a brighter future for our country. Hopefully my above statements clarifies my conjection on how a president is able and could be prosecuted while also going into corporate ambitions from those of certain security clearances while in positions and after. The argument is not over the prosecution of one person, but of the many people and how that has affected the lives of those in this country from what happens afterwards. In preventative measures, the way media approaches civility and the rights of citizens with dignity and respect is vital to reestablish lives back from where corporate/business decisions done rashly have been and will be challenged to help rebuild and restructure the ideas and connectors of infrastructure and sustainability in “The American Melting Pot”.
-Philip Arthur Bonneau
5/30/2022 - A page from my Journal
The Be Best Campaign.
I’ve written about it before with the understanding that not all of us want to be in the spotlight. Not everyone of us are meant for the social responsibility. Not everyone wants to be a figure, but we are called one way or another to express and share.
Contributions had one way or another where others judge us online one way or another. Opinions had as should in any moment of influence. Relatability in conversation, action and interest where invasion takes over into areas sacred and not to be shared with everyone. There is an actor’s life, but we all wear masks and are transparent one way or another where comfortability is important.
I’ve spoken on the bee aspect before (being a SEA part of The Savannah College of Art and Design). I stand my ground on what is and isn’t a conjecture of opinion. Everyone has one and everyone has motives.
I translate the “Be Best” campaign which was originally about online bullying to be about the elite status of what you can get away with in ownership and privilege. This is not an unseen force and there is always balance to it in gray areas. I found it to be aspirational in meaning but denoted “losers” in the Best golden trophy arena. Jackets speak truth where names and seals on golf courses as if this is a par reference between you and I.
Online bullying. Onion Opinion.
Ownership rights based on what could be meta or just what you are used to.
Privilege good and bad everywhere. Where the idea of what is said and spoken is to help others in times of difficulty and coping. I defer to my Ugly Simple Truths blogs where those were taken away and my 9 stages of coping that I’ve modified and refined as of the last month or so.
To be Best to me refers to Ahmed Best and Jake Lloyd. Both from different areas. Best was ridiculed for Jar Jar online to the point of a suicide attemp. Expectations not what they seemed in something en-grained in culture where others think it is theirs (and in social-psychology it kind of is) and against an artist’s contribution.
Representation is important and we forget the human side of things. We are introduced to characters and archetypes. As proven that carries over where politically we all represent something in full page ads. The ridicule that Best received almost cost him his life knowing what is spread on the internet or digitally felt more more a brand than human life and understanding. There is a difference where pieces of souls are not what you get if known.
I speak of Jake in particular. A child with the weight of Vader. History foreshadowed. Weight of the world to get from A to D. The story always built and expanded on. A child’s journey is about mentorship and protection, clearly understanding what brands represent. Is it commercial or is it personal. Life lost as could could in the attempts to open up. To find a self is to accept who you are privately and publicly, but with masks in every areas.
“Bee Best” in this regard is always about social oral towards suicide prevention and protecting children learning the world and the mantle they have. #nolostboys
We all deserve a life and privacy.
Where we sit determines what we can and can not do.
Child protection there. Peer protection present.
As stories told, the lexicon of what we attach ourselves to is important.
Intention everywhere.
Vulnerability is something that most don’t share. A prohibition of opening up but also it involves areas of attack for others.
Why attack?
Why build off others?
Who are you to own creative expression which changes based on any perspective if you could look in other directions.
As we all learn things go in ways of ownership, the question remains on how we develop and what is enforced in behavior.
Just because you see it on a screen or computer does not mean you own those people or characters. A connection had in fiction where real life is different where heroes made vulnerable and villains are actually heroes. All have a life outside of what is given and interpretation always there.
Different with the the First families and what happens during and after service.
Privacy abound where “Be Best” is about stopping personal attacks towards individuals and using things for your advantage at the detriment of others. (especially in the capitalistic side of artists and their contribuitions)
The candidness of Best…an interview of self and talking of child. Strength in honesty to self, family and others to help knowing the ridicule faced. Lloyd did the same, a child with the shadow of Vader on his back.
The cultural aspect is no discount to the development of self where no one owns our contributions but everyone can judge.
Be Brave.
The lessons learned challenge as to know what we are doing and what we represent.
A careful lesson for those of opinion where we connect but our private lives are ours. Differentiation.
If the conversation is to be about humanity, I defer to “The Force” and in regard to what is “Be Best”. Get to know someone or the character they are. Otherwise understand you may be a character to someone else.
Social responsibility.
Private Intimacy.
A Hello.
A Good-Bye.
The weight of being front facing is more valuable than behind the scenes. Human life always important.
The connection is where representation connects.
Intimately yours as unemployed,
Where are you best? We all have our faults and weaknesses. Stranger when someone knows what they represent. To a child. As a Child. We all grow.
Reagan, Republicans and the public talking points of Star Wars references. - A possible real government campaign wrapped with Jedi and Siths on stopping the social injustice of online branding and executive orders of bullying and social media termination.
As the “Be Best” is a government funded program that is currently not being worked on, it’s social status is available in the public domain to work on. As “Be Best” is similar to “If you Ain’t First, you’re Last” I would either love to talk about brand changes with Will Ferrell or come up with a slogan that denotes “Being Better” where we all try to better ourselves and learn from past mistakes and others successes.
-Philip Arthur Bonneau
