An Open Letter from a Human and Free Agent Looking for Representation, Security and Removal from an Environment That Includes I being a Human Labor Trafficking Victim.

An Open Letter from a Human and Free Agent Looking for Representation, Security and Removal from an Environment That Includes I being a Human Labor Trafficking Victim.

My name is Philip Arthur Bonneau.

I am a 42 year old Private American Citizen.

I have collectively over 50 book to my name in Copyright Protect that is based on autobiography, mythology, psychology, sociology and spirituality in one true story after another that defies and questions many aspects of what others would considered possible, and yet is.

I am looking for representation, as I have never had it before, just as much as I am looking to be picked up by any company that is interested in conversations of morality andpemseverance against the odds of life presented to I.

I am looking to be removed from my attackers and abusers, which comes with awareness and choice of private publically traded companies and The United States Government.

I am broken hearted for what business has allowed to be acceptable in the face of human rights violations as well as have in official statement by a secondary education institution and retired federal judge that America does not protect ideas. That is terrifying to consider of mentality in the internet age, devastating for a college investment and most certainly of American landscape in which capitalism and selfishness has taken over the American Dream of anyone for others to take for themselves.

I can say I’ve been attacked for 7 years once others caught wind of my property value, and I have been attacked in methods not only cruel and unusal but ignorant of leadership that sees an advantage here of pick up and then wish for the creator not to be there and them translate something they have no clue how to outside of face value.

I wrote first novel and published it after legal Library of Congress protection in 2019. That book was called “Curated Jellyfish” and it was revised and finalized in 2022 with the added moniker to it of “A Paradise Stolen”.

The book summed up my solo and passion projects started in 2011 publically of figuring out the phases of grief, transforming them into solid stages of process and was connected of getting there through mythology and the comprehension of mindset of Dante’s Work with “La Commedia”.

The original idea was questioning what is mental “Hell, Purgatory and Heaven?” and applying that psychologically to anything for the self to consider in the weight of environmentals and capability of pulling from anything experienced and learned direct or indirect to get towards, “Acceptance”, which I have found to be not required to be anything but an internal/external to get to with no other person needed to find peace and closure of benchmarks of life.

I can say that book was impeded on by there 45th adminstration and acted upon with their own self interests without compensation of conversation with I. That is illegal according to US law and directly violates The Library of Congress.

Instead of helping while I did the best I could under the radar to bring to their attention a matter of United States vulnerability and liability to Online Mug Shots, I have been left to rot in the same abusive environment that found I in 2018 shortly after the creation of my website. I find it saddening for American history that not only is the Federal government liable, but leadership and availability within had no problem with torturing a private American citizen while leaders and position abandon the Constitution, oaths of office and the concept of human dignity in which I reviewed and consider the 6 years since publish of that book.

That is trillions in liability there of a practice that went outside the scope of usage and denies due process according to the law of damages before trial and verdict.

I don’t know the price tag on the fact that was brought to attention and then treating the creator of the property you are aware of as a slave and a prisoner of Guantanamo in a hope for their suicide when you have 6 years of liability and awareness on the matter and chose as a country to not even address that outside of questions on why Donald Trump flaunted the pardon promise during that time.

With workplace attack towards I based on internet and electronic advantage towards I, there are a series of events that lead to a suicide attempt for I on Feb. 21, 2019 which would and is a absolutely stopping point of my attackers moving forward in attempt for my creative property at the cost of my life and my family’s thrive and succeed based on the notion of “Honoring thy mother and father” and “Being my sibling’s keeper”.

Whatever the scenario was between 2018-2019, the creation of “Curated Jellyfish” was done so removed from those liable environments and I found myself full circle back at the institution of my undergrad in employment and then 6 months later able to actually go back for my Masters degree at The Savannah College of Art & Design.

Most of that book since then has also already been impeded on by The Walt Disney Corporation majorly on their Marvel Division side which is not only billions of dollars in damages, but an entire length of legal copyright concern for an entity that also that has never picked me up and left me in this environment of detriment, poverty and psychological abuse and danger.

I reiterate it a choice to work with and as it stands of The United States or any private business I am a free agent and if anything happens to I, we did not partner. We are not friends and you have already consumed me and are a liability of leadership on how you choose to handle that.

I like to think of that statement of going back to the ridicule of Christ during the Stations of intentions there of others incorporations and find that if you wanted that ridicule publicly and then take over their intellectual property for your own success and their death, in modern times that echoes of the cause and effect of what passes in modern law and your moral problem in leadership and brand to deal with there on the secular religious side and here of the private citizen American Dream of any corporations awareness of “already incorporated” and “guilt the rest of your entity’s life of what was not yours, you will never fully understand without collaboration and you don’t deserve leadership against established laws internationally on human rights in consideration here.

I reiterate I the threat of my own life, that if any of this is not resolved despite every best effort on my part to do so within this environment of 6 years proven landscape, I will not care for the downfall of one business or the other or the entire United States of America based on principle and I will not look back on that because I’ll be dead.

That is what happens in a business world and global economy of internet connections.

Other brands know enough and some can afford to sit and wait and play the same vulnerabilities of field.

I defer the best I can to myth before any idiotic advantage point of leadership and brand thinks they are that all powerful of messages already engrained in culture pre-internet.

It took until 2021 that I was attacked again, where based on electronics advantage others saw another in towards property and methods prior used of 2 businesses prior, which goes to show I am thankful for the 1.5 years of reprieve and know others of willful intention can contain and restrain themselves.

With alll that instantly reported as I have in every scenario, I was wrongfully terminated and my education illegally suspended at the same time from The Savannah College of Art & Design on Feb. 10, 2022 when the head of HR and SCAD had full liability upon them from first report of April 2021 that was escalated to federal compliance.

Based on the events after, I cannot go anywhere else outside of self-serving of protect on the other side while looking at criminal intention during employment due to the fact SCAD continued to rip off my works published and unpublished for their own gain causing what would of been an internal investment with in my application for SCADpro Director/SCAD Art sales director in which I interviewed for.

The liabilities found in that area are catastrophic of the college landscape and of national implications that is generational and a crime against humanity as the liabilities there exceeds trillions collectively on the matter.

Post employment I pick myself up and try to find what I could do where I began to write out my rationale on how I came to an art series that would of been my masters thesis titled, “Starving Artist”. During that writing exercise post employment I had to rationalize the landscape of life experience of my own accomplishments before going into what lead to my suicide attempt due to business liability and playing mental roulette with complete disregard to human life. The writings do note again billions of dollars in liabilities in places of structure and to some back in the trillions marker while also finding moral conflict and injury weighed of the sanctity of marriage from my time of 3 years at Alfred Angelo that went into abusive and exploitative tactics towards I to their entire dependency of the company for their survival if they were able to get past 2017 which they did not based on their owner’s abandonment of the property and Chapter 7 bankrupt.

That can be found at https://www.philipbonneau.com/starvingartist

Post then I continued with my writings and arts while in legal battle with SCAD.

I continued writing and building off my own works even to the point of creation of a whole comic book universe called Chimera that again is another one of those 70-90 years past my life of property protect that could be picked up and has yet to be on the matter.

Knowing the landscape of attack towards I, that entire universe in book form is designed like the crowd choice of Pontius Pilate and is not only a personal test of character, but also that of current and established business leading to their own death and destruction within known variable landscape or their salvation if so be of moral correct on the matter.

To date, I have not been removed from this environment and the more my property gets consumed, the more Controlled Emotional Response is had in affect on the matter.

I can say that property was still attacked to where I have as much objectiveness as need be to have boards have their own private discussions of leadership, jury to “beyond a reasonable doubt” and any repercussions of crimes against humanity in the fact of human labor trafficking that comes with it in surround.

After wrongful termination I fought SCAD legally, and did so as my American rights were stripped during of right to seek council and rights to privacy in particular where I can state no legal discovery was ever had in court or arbitration while SCAD official and of president impeded on my property that they would have to attest to on how they got which goes into notions of exploitation of law firm and media privileges on the matter that goes against the constitution, abuse of power and privileges and done so in the backdrop of the threat of a burst to the entire college system and the financial structure of loan with it vs. intellectual property rights of owners and creators within a conversation I am fully aligned with the current siting president on in the abolishment of “Educational Purposes” loophole with question towards their 45th administration where there is no loophole over the invasion of my creative property and “Curated Jellyfish” in application.

I fought that battle pro se and without legal council that ended with obstruction of justice in a backdrop of moral ambiguity of questions of “Where do you think you money and power came from generationally?”

During that time I continued with my arts and books and can safely say I made one life altering discovery of narrative and find after the other which is probably quite the point if I sat here in 2022 and fundamentally changed an answer to one of Oepipus’ Sphinx riddles that has 10,000 years established to it before looking at the other main 2 and doing the same.

Case in point, I don’t know who his continuing to be a detriment here towards I, but it has gotten to the point in self protection and adapt of try everything to save myself and morally constantly teach others of back off and uphold Constitutions and Law.

I even applied to Scotland for political asylum during this time, which I have never publically stated and it was denied. I know I an apply to others for the same thing, but the fact my electronics have been invaded over and over is an isolation tactic of human traffickers to consider on why I go about the methods I do for help and completely capable of success and sustain if I can removed from an environment where abusers have taken control and can be punished by the rest if need be on the matter.

I am fully capable of success and I am a safe bet and surity that the liabilities of my attackers can never be paid in full, but the entire landscape can change and I still need reprieve and time away from this environment in what is easily a small investment opportunity towards corporation and sustain with my works.

If' I am continually left in this environment with those areas of attack proven and also on my website between my sound design page and blog page, then that is of your generation at any age group to carry for all eternity of proven beyond a reasonable doubt while trying everything I can to curb this.

It got to the point I even broke and posted online the destruction of papal infallibility, which is probably required for anyone to know all humans are capable of error and learn just as much as institutions. The reliance is on the time to process any decision.

Thank you for your time,

Please help in remove of environment and I am a smart investment to be had of what others consider pocket change and others willing to do whatever to attempt to murder I and detriment my life for the last 7 years.

-Philip Arthur Bonneau

Possible Pitch of Movie Beginnings or Streaming Series of The Copyright Protected works, "Philip Arthur Bonneau v. The Savannah College of Art & Design: a law novice story"

A Work in Progress Pitch.

I am wondering if I can do a GoFundMe for Philip Arthur Bonneau v. The Savannah College of Art & Design: a law novice story to turn it into a documentary film or streaming series. 

I find it would be cost effective enough to purchase a single camera and rent a small space apartment and home to film myself in the fully owned. complaint and copyright of over 4 years of battle of what was already established law and should of been followed and was not.

I stated to The Library of Congress and copyright my sole ownership over the entire legal case based on the matter that SCAD lawyers and the retired federal judge are considered contract to hire on case-by-case bases of employment and have no legal rights of ownership, nor SCAD as I was the original filer of the Superior Court Case in Chatham County and paid for that to be done so and legally served to the college. 

It would be documentary style and I own my words, my perspective and time investment on the matter. 

The entire complaint goes into Obstruction of Justice, what occurred prior and then what crept into an internattional art college of America where I was forced to fight on my own while knowing I was stripped of my constitutional rights as well as human rights to fight not only for the protection of myself, my family, my property but for any Student Investor of a college that molds into not only a national discussion, but a global one of secondary education and the question of American investment of current generation and the weighing of value on that for future generations. 

As SCAD has already self-protected themselves illegally off my property intellectual and during complaint, the idea of teaching myself to be a filmmaker and a documentarian is easily affordable and capable of being done here. SCAD has waived all rights to the complaint and damage has already been done, so I can move on with my life and become a leader of environments unknown one way or another in a self-contained narrative of abuse of power within college landscape and America within the digital age. 

The landscape is ripe for discussion as fair use and educational purposes are put to task and challenged to a point of a potential jury landslide on the matter. 

Protectorate of government backed federal student loans a question on if a bubble bursts or floats off. 

If government is going into the Department of Education anyways, a challenge here is had on what they can and cannot act upon of copyright protected works in which The American government has already violated in fact on, and would more than likely do the same within the education system of current stance. 

A very good Harvard counterance of intrigue in student investors and naive ingenuity, where that goes both ways as the young mind, or of heart in this case, gets very creative in challenge of exploit and human labor trafficking within the digital age. 

It could be an exibitionist’s collaboration knowing the percentages rates of I to screener would be far more sustainable while tackling the rip off of creative property by The Walt Disney Corporation on my works and having that funnelled through The Savannah College of Art & Design to do so after already aware of prior incidents leading to a suicide attempt and others continuing with psychological warfare. 

It does have festival merit to it before possible Award Season, where I contend to myself, “I’m totally a Starving Artist” during trying to figure out what to Ware for these events.

I’m still probably just more balanced of diet on the matter and slimming down, but those are the ropes and thats the Read Carpet. 

What would I need here for this to get off the ground?

A Space.

A Camera.

Some learning Experience.

Comfortability of cost of living.

Comfortability that when someone says “Cease and Desist” that means narrative stops and stop intimidating witnesses or we start going Biblical on that matter that some witnesses knock on doors and are actually quite polite to talk to but they don’t freaking invade people’s private property and houses. 

Side note, I see where that Read Stain of Doorframe is going. 

If Mary had a little Lamb, that lamb grew up and did one thing or another. 

And that lamb had their own lamb, and from there generations of lambs come to Lambda legal. 

They do get you when you are young one way or another. 

I digress….

I see that a reasonable 200-250K budget for this is amazingly doable.

I am pretty sure less is needed, but I am looking at not doing anything else for the rest of the year.

I’m totally going to Blair Witch this. 

"Re-Claimed: a law novice story of time spent.”

I see this as an individual documentary style that can evolve if ever picked up and gained traction.

A story of trials and tribulations, but not without some experisence of Mock Trial of both lawyer and witness, so that helps leading to the production of something without SCAD approval leading to an illusion that a case is carefully considered of film and narrative between plaintiff and defendant of a jury of 12 peers selected from both sides to find out at the end SCAD defaulted and has not rights or business on the matter and have the defenant side walk over to the plaintiff side and leave the defendant space empty for the entire jury to side eye the mess out of them of full disclosure before getting to that reveal. 

My student body.

My choice. 

Your Student Body.

His Perjure Official of SCAD.

The low budget can totally expand and integrate into reinactments of which contracts, agreements and even insurance is available to intertwine and expand on time’s investment and where an idea goes once it is read or experienced. 

A challenge to hold onto the American Dream, knowing there is always another Dreamer out there. 

Soldier Boy of Love can say of ever Sade there is a Sadé. 

Mining the field one way or another of plow. 

:)

The documentary would be contained to the narrative of "Philip Arthur Bonneau v. The Savannah College of Art & Design: a law novice story.”

Although “No ’Starving Artist’s” was submitted federally to copyright and of conversation to SCAD in legal and legally bound methods, they chose not to discuss any bit of content within and due to budget constraints I can mention it is there but do not have to go into any of the content of character there in documentary form.

That would be a separate project entirely as it maps out 12 years of actual life and does the best they can with a landscape seemingly and then landscape most certainly real.

Side eye continues…..

PS. I love my side eye. 

Makes me think of generations and what to say and when to of perspective.

I can’t anticipate everything, but that is a satisfying JAWS awareness from a different angle. 

12 Sets of Side Eyes continue one way or another. 

Anyways, I have already in text and book form talked about America’s Cheap Asses and look at me being all kinds of affordable in chomping at the bits. 

It pays off in multipliers. 

Dividends are completely different. 

I’ll yank the A from that one and say, “befriend golithes”. 

It gets back to math, art and word of mouth in variety one way or another. 

17 Page Preview of "No 'Starving Artist's"

Considering my textbook, “No ‘Starving Artist’s” has not sold a copy outside of the physical I have purchased for myself, I decided to do what Blurb.com allows of previews of my works that Barnes & Noble does not.

The decision to go with Barnes & Noble dealt with the page limitations of Blurb.com and I had exceeded that with the book and was not about to split it into Two just to keep everything in one place.

Enjoy the preview and if interested in purchase, it can be found at https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/no-starving-artists-philip-bonneau/1144532436 where the textbook is reasonably priced within the realm of relative text books at $101 USD.

Enjoy

A Conjection on "The Untouchable" status of Presidential Prosecution.

A Shouting Match to Some - Civility in Others.

A carryover from May 15th written (slightly modified)

“Your fucking political agenda is no match for The American Dream knowing it is global and yes, I will curse out the highest office in any area that this was allowed to happen.

Former presidents are not free from prosecution and in that liability you become a liability to The United States of America by default in protectionism and isolationist.

I’m a child of this Earth and respect to all countries joined together as I protect their child and heritage in exploitation that, in the United States, we do not divide. We do not bank on one’s suicide and we never ever try to divide this country as either president or would-be elect.

The collective conscious has enough evidence to support that you either better humanity or fall to the wayside in all privileged thoughts. The office of president always represents hope and capitalism is completely voided of that dream as private ventures shift to the public corporation that is America. Think of others and either time spent wasted on ego vs. doing the right thing.”

The argument that a president can not be prosecuted or sued is contrary to the belief of being “Untouchable”, “Infallible” and free to do whatever he/she wants without liability. As no man/woman is afforded that protection; so must the argument be challenged and countered.

If any president past, present, future cannot be prosecuted or sued based on their status (current or former), they too loose all rights to sue anybody in any scenario as they cannot be challenged in argument under that conjecture. They also cannot directly press charges on anyone as even judges can be found prosecutable, thus possibly over extending their executive privilege into the judicial branch at the time or none at all.

By having the bully pulpit removed from this argument, the conversation becomes about one’s interests and intentions. If a former/sitting president is not prosecutable, the damages they inflict on others becomes the liability of The United States of America where civil, state & federal complaints are pushed in a direction where “The Untouchable” is either anointed incapable of error & wrong doing or raises questions on could they ever have any capitalistic venture afterwards as it raises questions on unfair competition and business practices. The fallibility of corporations cannot be protected by someone unprosecutable and would have to be looked at extensively from judge of character and brand promise.

In prosecution arguments, one has to look at actions as either for self or country. As a president represents all parties, races, religions, orientations and genders in that capacity, other areas represent rule of law and the other change & function.

As party titles are held, they all represent thumbprints to the states & territories of the definition of “American”. If one were to create parties, one looks to Democratic Republican values where parties all have brand promises, employee handbooks & leadership roles before coming together or not to play Stratego® with one another (now expanded beyond the 2 party version) to capture The American Flag for everyone.

The responsibility of the President should be looked at corporately in the “Too Big to Fail” category where if approached systematically with no prosecution available; further adaptation is required in the check and balance arena to back up “The Untouchable Claim”. I’ve explored the idea of 2 Presidents/2 Vice-Presidents to alleviate liabilities while also promoting mental health of office holders that gives balanced rationale and peace of mind when executing executive orders (or lack there of). This is based around many points of discussion including “The Great Invisible Wall” and the events surrounding Jan. 6 2021.

One must look at the events of terminology & party names. As the standard parties are Republican and Democrat, other parties lay outside the system where a 3rd major party is suggested to break-up divisions knowing multiple Houses and Party Branches already exist.

The word “Trumpism” is defined on the internet already and broad with references where brand promises say one thing and rule of law says another. It is defined by action one way or another where according to wiki, “a set of mechanisms for acquiring and keeping control of power associated with Donald Trump…” (8) (9)

Now…that can be taken many ways where the focus should be on sets of modifications, addenda and referendums on acquiring and balancing out the focus from one political power back to the priorities of respect for the ideas of The United States and voided of dominance over one class, gender, race over another in the 331 million+ others that also are namesakes to America knowing we are all equal in respect to the 195(countries).

The term denotes one things where the 331 million is the living aspect and not the cumulative social collective of investment and learned behavior. Is a party or movement sustainable surrounded by one person or greater ideals of connection?

Imagine if Clintonite was used to combat Trumpism. Would the references last longer than generational connection? Perhaps the Bushwackers are for something else. Perhaps the argument is a complete Obamanation of brand and promises. As one sounds from the Trumpit, it is important to know that if there wasn’t brand approval to the actions of Trumpism, how does that work in realms where others are definitely prosecutable?

If positions held in corporate belief standards, the idea of acceptable losses is to be considered while looking into bankruptcies and collections. Self vs. Country gain where the collection bins are circumstantial based on knowledge and belief systems. Strongly held beliefs in areas where passion and conviction leads to intention. If intention to keep Trump in power, it is far more beneficial for him not to run for re-election than to seek another term as the choice of could vs. should becomes a private win on both sides while things grow back from talking about one’s power and privilege to the idea of what are our rights and whit is sacred to this country and world.

If he runs, he has 4 more years possibly if there is a win and then that is the end of his political career. If he runs and loses, he could always come back over and over again thus bringing in influence, intention and money. If he doesn’t run there is always the chance of him down the line thus solidifying his bases in the “Wait and See” category. At the same time a need to answer the prosecutable arguments where the bully pulpit and the division of country and rhetorical downgrades and slams get worked on as a country.

With names used in Media, legislative and in belief-system debate, one has to look at what that name represents and what is allowed prior and moving forward. “Refocus America” from division, ridicule and the “free to do whatever you want” mentality from those who have a supported system to lose nothing while everyone else sacrifices on decisions every day.

CNN reported on a Bannon Cast where he talks threats to politicians and Garland on Impeachment if Trump is indicted. The take away from this is the fear and threat aspect/tactic that is obviously sanctioned and never denounced as a brand promise to Trumpism. In the “Too Big To Fail” category it is obvious that threats, ridicule, scare tactics and “The Bully Trumpit” is used to continue operating in fear which pushes things back to history repetition. If unable to be prosecuted, then the rules can go one way or another where sanctioned behavioralism and influence lead to social division and the events of Jan. 6, 2021. If the rule of law is not enforced in areas allowed prior to where things are going, it will continue to degrade the value of The United States into private corporatization, where we lose our collective identity to those that can never be prosecuted, too big to fail and clearly capable of error in any direction.

Mr. Bannon,

As I recall you were terminated from your position under The Trump Administration.

It is known internally and externally how you operate and where you think your influence is.

How do you get to speak on behalf of the former president of The United States with fear tactics & false influence?

The events surrounding Jan. 6th and the behavioral subjectry puts you in possible liability for continuing to fan the flames of constant uprising and possible personal injury to others and country in repeated documented instances.

The president “may” not be prosecutable, but his circle and connections based on known behavior very much are.

While entitled to your opinion, we are all trying to stay ahead of the game on how one person’s belief system leads to the false notion of pardons for bad behavior at the expense of the sanity and civility of The American People.

As a man with a voice, if you want to say one thing or another about continual fear towards others, you are free to say whatever you want. It is inferred that you can’t be impeached but definitely can be prosecuted. It is also inferred that perhaps times in Administrations was a great beginner’s program for talking about how to strengthen American policy and stability outside the learned behavior of your surroundings. Fear leads down many paths…

I suppose Trump will tell you what you can and cannot say about him with a possible change of approach from one source to another. As it is assumed he is very brand protective; sanctioned rhetoric could lead to a perception of how he wants the country in constant fear and power plays one way or another. It has been scientifically proven that constant states of fear and tension can have some side effects such as lowering of one’s life expectancy, constant mood swings, insistence of verifiable persecution, loss of income, loss of faith, patterned morale loss, and emotive meme’ing.

It is very cognizant the behavior that the Trump brand has recognized and sanctioned. The unspoken sanctionary really adds up on what is and isn’t his brand.

Fear not though; there is hope.

In support for the American Standard of Civility and Culture, narrow points-of-views can be opened up to broader thoughts beyond any political season and what we leave behind in legacy and of support for future generations.

Burnt from the past behavior, it is important to think of the future brightly beyond the degradation of policy and scare tactics of sociology. Instinct born of constant fear and persecution bridges people together against a singular enemy more so than divide. The Great Invisible Wall of the past has to come down from isolation and elitism in order to understand that actions have consequences and everyone is always held responsible for their heroics and villainy according to law.

From a civics standpoint, I am wondering if it is your belief a president cannot be indicted, was this from a certain point of view where the trickle down effect was a hope for pardons to playtime at the White House within the administration? A time-out may be in order to understand the severity of how battle cries and rhetoric has changed. Especially in a positive direction where the extended years of elite playtime has created severe corporate consequences to these colonies.

We are trying to move forward with a “Be Better” approach towards a brighter future for our country. Hopefully my above statements clarifies my conjection on how a president is able and could be prosecuted while also going into corporate ambitions from those of certain security clearances while in positions and after. The argument is not over the prosecution of one person, but of the many people and how that has affected the lives of those in this country from what happens afterwards. In preventative measures, the way media approaches civility and the rights of citizens with dignity and respect is vital to reestablish lives back from where corporate/business decisions done rashly have been and will be challenged to help rebuild and restructure the ideas and connectors of infrastructure and sustainability in “The American Melting Pot”.

-Philip Arthur Bonneau

5/30/2022 - A page from my Journal

The Be Best Campaign.

I’ve written about it before with the understanding that not all of us want to be in the spotlight. Not everyone of us are meant for the social responsibility. Not everyone wants to be a figure, but we are called one way or another to express and share.

Contributions had one way or another where others judge us online one way or another. Opinions had as should in any moment of influence. Relatability in conversation, action and interest where invasion takes over into areas sacred and not to be shared with everyone. There is an actor’s life, but we all wear masks and are transparent one way or another where comfortability is important.

I’ve spoken on the bee aspect before (being a SEA part of The Savannah College of Art and Design). I stand my ground on what is and isn’t a conjecture of opinion. Everyone has one and everyone has motives.

I translate the “Be Best” campaign which was originally about online bullying to be about the elite status of what you can get away with in ownership and privilege. This is not an unseen force and there is always balance to it in gray areas. I found it to be aspirational in meaning but denoted “losers” in the Best golden trophy arena. Jackets speak truth where names and seals on golf courses as if this is a par reference between you and I.

Online bullying. Onion Opinion.

Ownership rights based on what could be meta or just what you are used to.

Privilege good and bad everywhere. Where the idea of what is said and spoken is to help others in times of difficulty and coping. I defer to my Ugly Simple Truths blogs where those were taken away and my 9 stages of coping that I’ve modified and refined as of the last month or so.

To be Best to me refers to Ahmed Best and Jake Lloyd. Both from different areas. Best was ridiculed for Jar Jar online to the point of a suicide attemp. Expectations not what they seemed in something en-grained in culture where others think it is theirs (and in social-psychology it kind of is) and against an artist’s contribution.

Representation is important and we forget the human side of things. We are introduced to characters and archetypes. As proven that carries over where politically we all represent something in full page ads. The ridicule that Best received almost cost him his life knowing what is spread on the internet or digitally felt more more a brand than human life and understanding. There is a difference where pieces of souls are not what you get if known.

I speak of Jake in particular. A child with the weight of Vader. History foreshadowed. Weight of the world to get from A to D. The story always built and expanded on. A child’s journey is about mentorship and protection, clearly understanding what brands represent. Is it commercial or is it personal. Life lost as could could in the attempts to open up. To find a self is to accept who you are privately and publicly, but with masks in every areas.

“Bee Best” in this regard is always about social oral towards suicide prevention and protecting children learning the world and the mantle they have. #nolostboys

We all deserve a life and privacy.

Where we sit determines what we can and can not do.

Child protection there. Peer protection present.

As stories told, the lexicon of what we attach ourselves to is important.

Intention everywhere.

Vulnerability is something that most don’t share. A prohibition of opening up but also it involves areas of attack for others.

Why attack?

Why build off others?

Who are you to own creative expression which changes based on any perspective if you could look in other directions.

As we all learn things go in ways of ownership, the question remains on how we develop and what is enforced in behavior.

Just because you see it on a screen or computer does not mean you own those people or characters. A connection had in fiction where real life is different where heroes made vulnerable and villains are actually heroes. All have a life outside of what is given and interpretation always there.

Different with the the First families and what happens during and after service.

Privacy abound where “Be Best” is about stopping personal attacks towards individuals and using things for your advantage at the detriment of others. (especially in the capitalistic side of artists and their contribuitions)

The candidness of Best…an interview of self and talking of child. Strength in honesty to self, family and others to help knowing the ridicule faced. Lloyd did the same, a child with the shadow of Vader on his back.

The cultural aspect is no discount to the development of self where no one owns our contributions but everyone can judge.

Be Brave.

The lessons learned challenge as to know what we are doing and what we represent.

A careful lesson for those of opinion where we connect but our private lives are ours. Differentiation.

If the conversation is to be about humanity, I defer to “The Force” and in regard to what is “Be Best”. Get to know someone or the character they are. Otherwise understand you may be a character to someone else.

Social responsibility.

Private Intimacy.

A Hello.

A Good-Bye.

The weight of being front facing is more valuable than behind the scenes. Human life always important.

The connection is where representation connects.

Intimately yours as unemployed,

Where are you best? We all have our faults and weaknesses. Stranger when someone knows what they represent. To a child. As a Child. We all grow.

Reagan, Republicans and the public talking points of Star Wars references. - A possible real government campaign wrapped with Jedi and Siths on stopping the social injustice of online branding and executive orders of bullying and social media termination.

As the “Be Best” is a government funded program that is currently not being worked on, it’s social status is available in the public domain to work on. As “Be Best” is similar to “If you Ain’t First, you’re Last” I would either love to talk about brand changes with Will Ferrell or come up with a slogan that denotes “Being Better” where we all try to better ourselves and learn from past mistakes and others successes.

-Philip Arthur Bonneau