August 15, 2026
Added context of position above, it was known investigated and reported that Donald Trump, through Rudy Guliani awareness was selling presidential pardons at 10 million a pop.
This was caught by FBI agents and reported on in news.
This is also written about specifically with citation and links in the book Underwater World.
This practice, considering there was a personal financial benefit would be outside of scope of office of president of the United States as it would constitute private and personal interest/incentiives on the matter.
In this case, Donald J. Trump, or any president on the matter would not have immunity and would be prosecutable while calling into question those that actually paid to have pardons and they were granted.
This would be understood as a question of checks and balances here, which the judicial side was aware of this as they named FBI in particular who reported it and investigated.
As it stands, rules of conflict of interest apply here once again where Appointed Attorney General would have to be removed from this area of investigation and indiscriminately would have to have a fair and objective investigation and onto trial.
It has been noted that due to employment aspect, this has been again problematic with any appointments to Supreme Court on the matter of any president as they too would have to be removed from anything involving the appointer of their position.
The action here sets off a course of events that are both plausible to consider of widespread favoritism and where that would not be put up.
Actions of litigation is withheld at times and discretionary while in office, but again, Donald J. Trump would of been prosecuted for this out of office as well.
The connection of pardons in connection to Trump is long withstanding leading to presidential pardon promises of the January 6th, rioters, which can be investigated and assumed there might be a connection to that belief and standing and then “Curated Jellyfish: a paradise lost”, at the time that was modified during the 46th administration to “Curated Jellyfish: a paradise stolen” that goes into showcase in fact that the government specifically acted on my online mugshot section of the book without compensation.
Confliction points here of judicial and legality does create a schizm that is apparent towards end of 45th administration, the events leading up to the January 6th riots, and then into the 46th administration and actions that happened privately while governmental actions duriing that administration are not the responsibility of former 45th president.
As the January 6th riots were heavily investigated and Donald Trump even prosecuted for this in 2023 under the investigation of Jack Smith.
The investigation was dismissed upon his re-election, but the conjectures and likely scenario play spelled out in “The Loss Levels” holds true of probably in fact of country security and severity of crimes and possibilies of damages.
It is still understood the scenario laid out in those books cannot exactly be denied due to security issues and clearances, but presents a likely scenario that would have to wait about 50 years before said one way or the other on the matter leaving room for credible doubt of prior exploits within and of leveling the playing field of fair market, law and governance.
It is noted during campaigning for re-election, there is interactions between their campaigns of once again promising pardons while noted in text and documented in book of the same time I squashing that for them and other political hopefuls as no one outside of president can even begin to promise a pardon unless in office, and the prior method of exploit and sale could, and more than likely, funnelled money into Trump’s Super-PAC in the same motives and approach prior done during the 45th administration anyways.
I have again already laid position that it would be illegal for any sitting president or government official to own a Super-PAC while in office as it again creates conflict of interest and goes into absorb areas of government and brand confusion on the matter.
I have reiterated my conflict and consideration of the Biden Presidential Pardon of his son, and I get it emotionally and of landscape, but I dissented on the notion that it should of happened to begin with as it set up a precident that most certainly would of been used into the 47th administration for again the same notions of favoritism/personal connections and into the same mob boss mentality of, “Do me a favor and I’ll do one for you.” where based objectively on the above statement falls out of scope of presidential duties and is more than. likely prosecutable while in office, but definitely out of office.
There is a problem here with the schism because now you have the hired side of appointment and branches and then the necessary objective side that comes with more long-term or life-time appoiintments that needs to be considered in conflict here.
This is again why I have written about the removal of presidential nominations for judicial positions to remove conflict of interest and have those appointments be from actual judicial awareness and career instead of legislative/executive as that isn’t their area of expertise anyways.
The idea removes politcism of any legal position and guarantees the integrity of America law and top talent at the forefront of that area which is at the basis of Declaration of Independence anyways of origins in checks and balances.
That also means over time and years, as no president could appoint a Supreme Court justice, that there would not be any conflict of any lifetime member eventually if ever a presidential or otherwise trial or legal address had that doesn’t prohibit the full staff of Supreme Court from weighing in on merits for or in dissent on the matter.
As it stands, 1/3 of the top law office of America is barred from weighing in legally on any case involving Trump, which is applicable of any federal judge appointments he has made in his career including The Attorney General.
I write that respectfully and indiscriminately in the same area of how I have approached any bit of my civics lessons in belief best for country and long-term than any one area that others would find is again objective instead of other’s possible subjective.
As it would stand in this case of presidential “immunity” during the 47th admin, they were not immuned during the 46th administration whatsoever of trials and accusations towards investigation. Anything in office to prolong prior held claims and complaint would be considered obstruction of justice to prior crimes already reported/filed/claimed where in legal standing any sitting president can be civilly sued by anyone anyways, so when mattters of abuse of power or privileges comes up, it does denote openness of criminal prosecutions which more than likely would be handled privately by the government on the military side against commander-in-chief.
It is here again, my now dubbed, “Operation:Thunderbolt” still holds true of fuctional government and also a reprieve of splitting the responsibilities of 24/7 job of over 300 million living citizens and any and all guests of the county legally or otherwise.
Understood in fair elections, one takes the front-face and front-face appointments, the other takes the back half and their own appointments allowing for a workable relationship of balanced parties and if conflicts ever arise in interium until a better plan is found or the problem areas are worked out of prior exploit.
It is here that I have made a strong position on the 22nd Amendment and the legality of Trump’s 47th administration and where it shouldn’t of happened on one side, but if there is hidden prosecutions occuring, or did occur, then it makes sense of optics and interim at this time based on January 6th, the selling of presidential pardons and what has been known systematic defrauds within government where once again in connection to my life and works instantly addressed the educational side within the first 100 days of office.
It is here I add on to the 22nd Amendment and find there is room for applicable advance on the matter towards Vice-Presidents and limit of eligibilities and terms.
As both the United States and digital landscape has grown over the years with the advent and necesssary steps of digital protection of intellectual property, it is understood the Vice President is the only one of the two sworn to uphold the constitution on oath.
It would be considered fair and reasonable of both clearances and role of duties, that conflict of image and ambitions may arise with the top executive of next in line to presidency in some cases.
Based on the events during the 46th administration when the 22nd amendment could of been applied and was not, it is understood that there was brand confusion had in the marketability of image between former Donald Trump and sitting Joseph Biden where it is standard procedure to not refer to a former president as president or reinforce the “Former” aspect in any conversation, report or broadcast on the matter.
It would be safe moving forward to consider the idea that if a former Vice President is not consecutively nominated upon completion of their employer’s terms of employment for any reason, they would also no longer be eligible for presidency in non-consecutive terms based on conflicts of interest and security clearances/awareness of privileged information surrounding protection of the country in any perceived possibility of private/personal gain in any area to subvert The United States Government or it’s citizen in exploit or defraud.
I am pretty sure considering I know former VP Harris is a former California prosecutor, they might be able to weigh objectively on that based on the events that occurred during the 45th. 46th and 47th presidential administrations where it was their responsiblity to uphold the constitution during the 46th.
The questions surrounding how The Wallaces got to the highest honor of medal with president Biden in open and active cases involving obstruction of justice, defraud and copyright infringment wrapped around human rights violations and constitutional claims will come up in conversation and have been approached in book form, hypotheticals of crisis and in public record along with law enforcement report.
That is going to have to be a communal optics blast there or look
like a complete failure of national intelligence that stemed into the
47th administration.
The position stated is a first draft on the matter and done so in awareness surrounding catastrophic threat to The United States of America between the 45th—47th presidential administrations.
It is understood in this possible discussion of expanse on the 22nd amendment comes from a necessity of consideration by those far more experienced and versed than I, but it is healthy in consideration towards future prevents than what has occurred in the past.
It is understood that had that been a conversation prior even Joseph Biden would of been ineligiable for office under that consideration, but in the spirit of the 22nd amendment, that was also designed to prevent Roosevelts of dynasties and exploits of private/political ambitions moving forward.
That position could, in part, become a 28th amendment while there is clarification to uphold the Constitution and 22nd amendment instead of conversations of abolishment of it for reasons why it exists to begin with anyways.
-Philip Arthur Bonneau
August 15, 2026
_____________________
Also in plausible outlets and scenarios, based on all investigative information and liabilities it is more than likely that every Senator that experienced anything of threat to human life during the January 6th
riots could have and private arbitration sued Donald J. Trump civilly for their role outside scope of president and of negligence and disregard to human life and rule of law.
Private Arbitration still upholds that side as well as still private military trial as well.
(This section has been shared through screenshot and text messages privately.)
_______________________
Apple Note August 15, 2026 6:56AM
GREAT. I LISTEN to your areas of reference and we never met, so what makes me think you are going to have any credibility as a human or business in continuing this method?!
That you could of removed me from and chose not to.
Clearly I care and all you people do is bask in awareness without a resolve here.
First thing I am going to do is look up the producer of “Ever After: A Cinderella Story”
and before I do that I am going to know that is a Fox movie that is now Disney property.
I find you insulting, non-resolved here and I am aware of your awareness and what you have done here.
I respect people and companies, but I also need to sustain and live and when I have 50 books in the market and you never bought the rights to any of that, then you have to consider the fact of what you missed out on and what you can be prosecuted on in continuance all these years.
I’ll leave your company in poverty and carry on in reciprocate.
The 1998 film Ever After: A Cinderella Story does not credit an "executive producer" in its official billing block. Instead, the film was led by main producers Mireille Soria and Tracey Trench
____________________________________
Apple Note August 15, 2026 8:52AM
Seriously?!
Let’s try this one.
According to SCAD policy of assuming all student works rights and global marketing rights and royalties on the matter, SCAD as an entity is personally responsible for repayment of all student loans and they cannot use student creative to do so.
The End.
Government is required to step in and protect student federal loans that are governmentally backed.Can we quit this shit for at least a day?!
Phone another friend because this non extra here is well aware that he is protective of many things, but especially namesake.
Do you have any idea what like 47-48 years of creative damages is there?!
______________________
Meanwhile, donald trump is not for educative purposes and has said so professionally so he's not going to stand for some aspects of fair use in the government without compensation either based on practicality and morality.
Great. You said I prosecuted you.
I'm also not a prosecutor or the former VP of the united states and I don't put up from rip off of former government Poconos during the 46th admin and I assure as hell don't during the 47th which is went U basically said if I'm doing your jobs for your I'll just go run in position on the matter and then actually lead prosecuting
_______________________
What former VP do you not hear one bit about anymore that would headline such a thing?
_______________________
(Texts and Showcases I screenshot the prior section and also placed in Apple Notes as Images. Images since this morning were shared in reverse from latest to earliest.
"Earliest image was a suprise delivery in the middle of the night by
Amazon upon my father's doorstep that I found at 3AM in the morning.".
Texts portrayed backwards, but all of that recorded and timestamped in another area.
“That is an Open-Mike Question of Brushed Upon…..”
Also, by End of Day, All novels formally on Blurb.com are made
available on Amazon.com and the content is removed privately from Blurb.
If you wanted me to constantly play prosecutor here, I'll just assume the position of former Vice President(s).
"DJT of DTF?"
"Department of Justice Time of Don't Tease Fact-check"
____________________________________
Want me to continue with my private text messages where I flat out say this area isn’t stopping and disregarding common sense and moral weight of crimes against humanity and constitutional ground of violations to International Treaties?!
This Area has escalated over the last 3 days in particular and they need to shut the fuck up and respect privacy and everything else established of human civilization.
I get it, some are addicts in that area to ground rules they don’t control moving forward for the best of everyone’s sake.