Doesn’t matter at this point.
Within public record of sworn testimony of someone fighting for their human rights and standing up for those of artist’s of would be as well.
I don’t even entertain in the State of Georgia anymore in this regard.
It went Federal Years ago and most certainly global.
Of what would come is of perhaps of leadership think, private arbitration has yet to occur and surely private matters can be such as I PR reality and others bank of one thing or another.
I’ve said my peace of any influence in Georgia on the matter, which no longer has influence on this case in which others wish not to privately discuss.
Not my problem nor my partnerships.
Nothing else of I to say or write of SCAD.
- 1 -
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CHATHAM COUNTY
STATE OF GEORGIA
)
)
PHILIP ARTHUR BONNEAU )
Petitioner/Plaintiff, )
)
) NO. SPCV22-01289-ST
Vs. )
)
THE SAVANNAH COLLEGE OF
ART AND DESIGN
)
Respondent/Defendant )
)
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE AND AGREEMENT
Philip Arthur Bonneau would like to thank the Hon. Judge Stokes for their time in
review of this matter.
Plaintiff has laid out all evidence that they could in sitting that to the court of factuality
and for conclusion in which resolution could be sought.
It is noted by the Plaintiff that Arbitration was ordered to begin on September 7, 2023
and to date, as of February 20, 2024 it has not begun yet as SCAD has failed in their
obligations to pay the required $2000 dollars of 3rd party arbitrator fee to begin that due
process and payment due in order to begin.
- 2 -
Despite their own handbook saying they would cover fees in that area and select federal
judges, state judges were provided and in mutual selection, retired state judge Honorary
Judge Wright was selected and then the college wished to backtrack, despite mutual
agreement.
Plaintiff retains 3rd party retention of evidence in which has already been submitted to
them through the court and prior for any further correspondence in actions of
arbitration. As Plaintiff was the one that filed, and both defensive legal council and
State Superior Judge failed to meet deadlines according of law of speedy trial, it is
understood Plaintiff has won in merit of court and property of case is of ownership to
the Plaintiff.
This would be a considered aspect of truth based on what has been presented to the
court, that SCAD has failed to uphold legal deadlines in which goes to default and
lack of importance to resolve in what was presented to the court on December 27,
2022, as well as to The State of Georgia. By failing of response by the court within
the 90 legal days to so move the state into default as well and removal of discussion
and complaint in which to remedy which makes any aspect of appellate court in the
State of Georgia Moot, as they have waived their rights to further argument and
uphold established state law. Ga. Code § 15-6-21 in which I respect that of professional
investment of a life-time in this matter of defending my own investments of my life.
It is of note according to current Georgia law on the matter that “Revenge of The Pronouns” are
present in pre-existing structure of legality in which Honorable Tammy Stokes is female, and so
- 3 -
the written law does not apply to her on timelines of answer and so forth I imagine of so many
questions of equal rights and balancing out, there more than likely is in American standing
legally state and federal that it of foundationally not of this court case that females have the
upper-hand on law unabiding in this manner. Plaintiff contemplates supposed foundations
balance themselves out in that manner of equal right of that magnitude to denote perhaps not a
female colleague is about to jump on board that systematic change anytime soon without pay
disputes resolved and matters of discrimination that brought about change. Plaintiff digresses as
men finally understand the unfairness of pronouns in legalize and sway, and yet as most of one
system and not another have already figured that out in marriage, dating or getting to know.
It works the same on the other side towards equal rights so at least that could be understood
collectively that we all live in a dominate society in some way, shape or form and it is only a
matter of placement between professionalism and personalism towards intimacy.
It is up to the highest law enforcer of the land to uphold legal standing within the state they
reside over, which in this matter is Governor Brian Kemp, male, and been in position since 2019.
They were Secretary of State prior from 2010 to 2018, with won election in 2018 to
governorship. The 2018 State of Georgia governor was Nathan Deal, in which the presidents of
the college know personally and professionally and have utilized in their own private ventures
based on second-hand account. I am sure that is consider hearsay of the court and yet in matters
of prior governing of the state of Georgia, could had been called into question considering the
severity of the matter.
- 4 -
In such of “Revenge of the Pronouns”, the judge has done no wrong in this manner and of such
the state of Georgia has in which they can no longer weigh upon. You would need a female
Governor or Attorney General for the state to forego liability in which neither in position is and
thus The State of Georgia forfeits their rights to argue, defend or say otherwise further.
That would either be of an existing state law Plaintiff is not familiar with, or would have to be an
Executive Privilege in which to remedy of equal rights and protection under the 46th
administration. Plaintiff is unsure how that works but plaintiff submits judicially in which is
documented and public record and final response.
From there comes questions of how would that apply when a whole State defaults on Rule of
Law and upholding such? If none of the State Appellate aspects present, then surely there is
Federal Appellate, in which to or any court and case would say a waiver of rights and no one on
the other side to argue the matters at hand as both defense and state default on the matter in
which a law novice questions path present.
It does seem like a direct line to The Supreme Court minus the years of back and forth in which
legally The State of Georgia cannot defend and neither The Savannah College of Art & Design.
Ordered to Arbitrate back in Sept. 2023, does this become a first of it’s kind to land solely on the
legal Supremes of the land in weight and judgement of what has already been submitted and in
read? In doing so, Plaintiff retains that they submitted enough of most of prior EEOC
proceedings and EEOC interactions with Defendant before ever presenting the Superior Court of
Georgia.
- 5 -
It is of note to Defense, who still refuses to Arbitrate timely if at all, that there are copyright
aspects present within this case in which they cannot advance upon. It is Plaintiff’s legal right to
let defendant know that they cannot modify or adapt their current make and model of the college
in any way, shape or form without resolve of the matter in which has been presented to the court
and would be reiterated in arbitration. This most certainly includes all aspects of Better Business
Bureau disputes in which is copyright protected.
As it stands in non-mutualness, SCAD as an entity is in danger and a liability for any student
investor. They cannot legally in any way change their “royalty free” usage aspects within their
institution without resolve to Plaintiff and without permission of advancement while noting that
Discovery either of this court or otherwise was never on the table where Plaintiff presented to the
court flat out copyright violations against defendant during complaint which holds virtue and
protect 95 years after their death and of incorporated within entity during complaint and nonresolve.
Any change in such would denote the same issues addressed privately and of probable motive of
criminality in which has already been ascertain and proven beyond a reasonable doubt of any
jury or judge with evidence in compound provide to the court in which whatever structure prior
is not of my area, but Federal oversight and compliance has been present in this matter with The
Savannah College of Art & Design since April 2021, and issues of the state of Georgia since
2018 and most certainly proven in 2019 in other places of business towards global awareness and
global protection necessary. Plaintiff is an alumni of the college in which still has student debt 20
- 6 -
years later which will go back into repayment once Plaintiff gets out of Chapter 13 restructure, in
which they contemplated the harm of creditors in this matter against Guarenteed Federal Backing
or at least a look at in the matter of ripping off people and still going hard at in the guise of
“Educational Purposes”.
That one I do know where Donald Trump stands on. That isn’t an endorsement for anything as I
have 45th admins of factuality to “Curated Jellyfish” and making sure I am not saved for a
political season for anyone other than upholding pre-established rule of law.
Plaintiff would like to thank the court for what they have provided to I of original
disappointment and then had to see the other side of things in bigger pictures of matter and
landscape.
I imagine in legality of human rights of 5.5, almost 6 years of direct problems noted and cited of
officals in the State of Georgia, I find the failure of rule of law for personal interests present.
Plaintiff cites any bit of that on the political aspect as despicable of this country for that period of
time and of personal interest combined towards infrastructure issues of future resolve of state or
country.
What is ensured within this only legal battle of rights of Constitution and amendments to such, it
has been ensured neither Plaintiff nor my property in any sense of build or create is safe within
the landscape present despite all the evidence saying such.
- 7 -
It is noted in this case, under Georgia Law cited, the judge in ruling can be disbarred based on
actions of dismissal not allowed according to Georgia law and it is noted of this court and of
SCAD that the defendant has not intitiated arbitration proceedings since ruled to do so and then
with evidence can and did state that the president of the institution flat out copyright infringed
upon I in 95 years after my death in protected works which will always leave questions of open
doors of what happened to Plaintiff’s other works and most certainly “Curated Jellyfish” in
which they have an alliance with in presentation of fiction of life story.
Plaintiff understands that too would be in question of rulings while citing of direct and indirect
account the sway of legality of the college in the city of Savannah in which they don’t pay taxes
in anyways. It is noted in all my steps of life of utmost protect of the college investment and of
the students and then what occurred afterwards and during the events leading to my proveable
wrongful termination of federal issues of ADA violations and then oversight that problems
compound and others wish to continue without resolve while in systematic areas of justice, that
is present in which Plaintiff would and should be allowed sustainability and peace at this point
which has gone on for years.
Plaintiff has noted that which has occurred in The State of Georgia on the matter.
Plainiff is aware if that was allowed to occur in legal court of law and still not continue to begin
arbitration, Plaintiff is aware law firm representing defendant is of multiple countries and of
everything submitted to the court, despite what would be considered confidential of client
privilege.
- 8 -
Plaintiff finds they did what they could with rule of law in this state and country.
Passing the buck constantly despite evidence wondering what is the affordance and privilege
present, where doubtfully it would be of private resolve anyways as that would have already
occurred and has not even been initiated yet.
Plaintiff has no time for Georgia court at this point, as they have deferred and have no further
say. Plaintiff reiterates to the state of Georgia and to defending, “I am not your slave.” And yet
you have made me one. You both have failed to uphold and protect that which you stand for of
the law or of handbook, and now Plaintiff has to look at this in a political landscape once again
in which plaintiff already confirmed infringement upon their property of literary stance within a
country of promise and still shouldn’t of been of attack proven.
Plaintiff has nothing else to say of defendant at this point.
Plaintiff is well aware that defendant has impeded on their works well beyond the value of their
lifetime and into significance that Plaintiff is not really going to sit here and be friends with prior
positions in that capacity. Not in this time frame and not in what is United States Library of
Congress protection of check and balance.
Plaintiff isn’t even going to utter SCAD, The Savannah College of Art & Design, or any aspect
of such of current make and model. Plaintiff is an alumni, always will be, the mastery aspect of
their education path was attacked and any resolve of such has lead to now over 2 years of which
Plaintiff doesn’t wish to even consider the institution in any capacity. Plaintiff has their rights,
- 9 -
tried to protect student investor rights, and stake holders did one thing or another in which
Plaintiff am not a part of in negotiations or of mutuality.
Plaintiff has not even received a phone call but been continually attacked in areas of non-resolve.
When it comes to world’s investment, Plaintiff has understood Defendant’s problem areas as
much as they know plaintiff’s
Plaintiff’s rights were pretty much handed to them in incorporation of self-interest into
institution with copyright infringement of “After Jellyfish” pages 138-141 which went directly
into the 2023-2024 student catalog unauthorized and not approved as defendant tried to curb
legality in methods taught or shown to them by others.
Considering this of a Law Novice’s only case of factual legality to The State of Georgia, I find
that it is best to eventually be able to leave this land of unresolved issued.
Plaintiff have gone state plea and Federal to unresolve.
How much of this was political and factual?
World’s investments matter.
Considering the 5.5 years direct, both Plaintiff and State of Georgia defer to Federal in this
matter while questioning would SCAD even pay the 2000 dollars to begin private arbitration
tomorrow or not. It isn’t like Plaintiff is not within the landscape of American Cinema translating
their private property anyways during this while I at 300 dollars to my name.
- 10 -
Even if I die, the 95 years past death denotes you have Federal Oversight of Sandcastles of
Corporatology and this is my story owned of a court deferred of state to the nations.
Thank you all for your professional time in this manner.
All of our life’s investment mattered in this for ourselves and others.
Plaintiff has no further reason to entertain This Odyssey system further.
- 11 -
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: February 20, 2024 Electronic Sign – Philip Arthur
Bonneau
Name: Philip Arthur Bonneau
Title: Self-Represented, Student,
Employee, Alumni
Address: 2309 New York Ave.
Address:
City, State, Zip: Savannah, GA 31404
Phone: 404-786-6261
Fax:
E-Mail: philip@philipbonneau.com
Attorney No.: Self-Represented