A start from The Law Novice on my non-fabricated number in my un-responded to serving of a lawsuit.

The very real number attached to my wrongful Termination from SCAD, How I came to it and not including any aspect of my creative property compromised. Still just a drop in the bucket in the DIY world of former basement dwellers such as myself and nothing of people’s salary or overall revenue but multiplies beyond belief in consideration.

It is understood that I have been retaliated in ways one can only imagine for several years and amped up after February 10, 2022. In the I needed and need help category and have not been able to seek council, this was how I got to my figure in the lawsuit in which is clear cut in evidence of SCAD’s liability. It was stated by SCAD’s lawyer and available according to the freedom of information act that SCAD would be liable if proven of such. It was further stated that Mr. Bonneau has not been able to do that. Mr. Bonneau can and Mr. Bonneau is aware of false statements made to the EEOC on such and what that means based on the minimal evidence supplied by SCAD and attached to the EEOC investigation. Mr. Bonneau is also aware that the lawyer was well aware of the events reported and went through compliance in April 2021 and Mr. Bonneau copy-wrote protected his BBB complaint, final statements of the EEOC and position statements marked up in how SCAD can and cannot use Mr. Bonneau’s name in any capacity of further slander and libel practices that were done officially to The State of Georgia, internally and towards the detriment of my career and mental health.

I’ll wait…understanding United States copyright is protected 70—95 years after the originators death.